Expert opinion

Closing the SME Funding Gap: What You Need to Know

‘Gap Capital’ has enabled a host of RDs to not only solve client funding requests that fall outside the bank’s usual credit appetite, but to win new-to-bank clients with funding requirements that would usually be judged as ‘Too much too soon’. We’ve produced a checklist of the specific ways Gap Capital can help your clients bridge the SME funding gap…

5 minutes
July 4, 2024
Words:
Alexei Garan
Images:
PDF:
Report

Since 2018, the Shaw & Co Business Funding team has been in continuous discussions with numerous teams of Relationship Directors (RDs) and Business Development Directors (BDDs) from major UK banks regarding the use of alternative funding markets to fill the SME finance gap between bank credit policy and client funding requirements.

The colloquially known ‘Gap Capital’ has enabled a host of RDs to not only solve client funding gap requests that fall outside the bank’s usual credit appetite, but to win new-to-bank clients with funding requirements that would usually be judged as ‘Too much too soon’. Crucially, existing clients are retained, and new clients are re-banked with any ‘excess’ funding risk outsourced to the alternative market.

This creative approach to the SME finance gap offers another robust tool for RDs and BDDs seeking to solve a range of funding problems. We’ve produced a checklist of the specific ways Gap Capital can help your SME clients…

1) Insufficient bank credit appetite to accommodate all the funding request

As tolerable leverage is higher amongst funders in the alternative markets when compared to traditional high-street lenders, they can be used for gap capital to top-up any available funding from the major banks. We can help arrange the additional capital, leaving the bank within its credit tolerance, while providing custom for the incoming alternative lender – a truly win-win-win situation.

2) Client needs a non-amortising or a partially amortising loan

SMEs wishing to fund growth typically prefer to retain capital within the business for internal investment, as opposed to paying the sizeable capital amortisations required on a bank straight-line repayment loan. Alternative gap capital debt can be much more flexibly sculpted around the cashflow plan of the business, and these fully non-amortising ‘bullet’ loans are common.

3) Fast growing client, but insufficient record of profitability

Some clients have earnings growing rapidly towards breakeven and are already showing a strong trading EBITDA within the next 6-12 months. A BDD at a traditional bank, however, cannot pick up the business until there has been a strong proven EBITDA of around two years.

Nevertheless, the bank can still win such a client, their clearing, ancillary income, deposits etc, while outsourcing any initial gap capital funding requirements to the alternative market. Then, in 18-24 months’ time, when bank account history and financial reporting has been established, showing a clear refinancing case, the client is then not only loyal to the bank for believing in them, but also has a natural incentive to refinance and bring down the cost of capital from the alternative lender to the cheaper traditional bank interest rate.

4) Earnings composed of items (e.g., R&D tax credits) falling outside credit policy

Non-standard components of EBITDA, such as R&D tax credits within IP (Intellectual Property), may be outside more stringent bank credit policies, but entirely acceptable to the alternative market in terms of gap capital.

5) Lacking or insufficient tangible asset collateral cover

Lending that is not covered by tangible asset collateral tends to be a challenge for banks, whereas alternative lenders are much more accustomed to lending against a debenture, or even being unsecured. Thinking laterally opens-up many high-IP businesses and even sectors with a leasehold property structure (nurseries, assisted living/acute care facilities), where gap capital can provide a vital bridge.

6) Contract nature of revenues

Businesses that have revenues that are contractual in nature typically struggle to raise long-term funding, as they are perceived as being of higher risk by banks. Searching for alternative lending gap capital solutions that can be more flexible, or searching for specialist lenders that are more able to understand more exacting borrowing requirements, is therefore highly important.

7) Clients wishing to fund overseas acquisitions

SMEs looking to grow internationally need to first establish good relationships with traditional banking partners in the UK, and then overseas. Building relationships with UK banks which have both the ability and bank counterparties in overseas territories is critical, along with an understanding of the risks involved of trading in overseas territories, understand currency risk, translation risk etc. Nevertheless, traditional banks may not be able to fund large-scale overseas acquisitions on their own, and so gap capital may be required to bridge that gap.

8) Unwelcome sectors – Restaurants, Construction, Oil & Gas

Recent years has seen many crises - Covid, the Ukraine war, spiralling inflation, cost-of-living crisis, and now the banking crisis. All these events shape the banks’ appetite, determining which sectors they will or won’t support. The financial crisis heralded a substantial change in bank appetite towards more asset-based lending, and this is a continuing trend. We can help to find gap capital solutions from alternative lenders for sectors that have fallen out of favour.

Alexei Garan is a Partner - Business Funding at Shaw & Co

If you'd like to discuss how Shaw & Co can help you sell, buy or fund the growth of a business, please book a meeting here

Words:
Alexei Garan
 - 
Partner
Read 
Alexei Garan
's bio

INDUSTRY Content

See all Shaw Reports
The Shaw Report: Leisure, Tourism & Sport - Interim Review #2

Shaw Report

|

June 27, 2023

The Shaw Report: Wholesale & Retail Trade - Annual Report #2

Shaw Report

|

June 27, 2023

The Shaw Report: Property & Construction - Annual Report #2

Shaw Report

|

May 30, 2023

The Shaw Report: Automotive, Transport & Logistics - Interim Review #2

Shaw Report

|

May 24, 2023

The Shaw Report: Manufacturing & Engineering - Interim Review #2

Shaw Report

|

May 10, 2023

The Shaw Report: Food & Drink - Interim Review #2

Shaw Report

|

May 9, 2023

The Shaw Report: Technology, Media & Telecoms - Interim Review #2

Shaw Report

|

April 17, 2023

The Shaw Report: Energy & Natural Resources - Annual Report #2

Shaw Report

|

March 28, 2023

The Shaw Report: Professional Services - Annual Report #2

Shaw Report

|

March 20, 2023

The Shaw Report: Banking, Financial & Insurance Services - Annual Report #2

Shaw Report

|

February 28, 2023

The Shaw Report - Healthcare & Life Sciences Annual Review December 2022

Shaw Report

|

December 14, 2022

The Shaw Report - Wholesale & Retail Trade Industry Interim Review December 2022

Shaw Report

|

December 14, 2022

The Shaw Report - Leisure, Tourism and Sport Annual Review November 2022

Shaw Report

|

November 29, 2022

The Shaw Report - Property & Construction Industry Interim Review November 2022

Shaw Report

|

November 23, 2022

The Shaw Report - Technology Media & Telecoms Industry Annual Review October 2022

Shaw Report

|

October 19, 2022

The Shaw Report - Automotive, Transport & Logistics Industry Annual Review October 2022

Shaw Report

|

October 12, 2022

The Shaw Report - Professional Services Industry Interim Review September 2022

Shaw Report

|

September 26, 2022

The Shaw Report - Manufacturing & Engineering Industry Annual Review September 2022

Shaw Report

|

September 1, 2022

The Shaw Report - Banking, Financial and Insurance Services Industry Interim Review August 2022

Shaw Report

|

August 23, 2022

The Shaw Report - Healthcare & Life Sciences Interim Review August 2022

Shaw Report

|

August 11, 2022

Food & Beverages Industry Report 2022

Shaw Report

|

July 22, 2022

The Shaw Report - Leisure, Tourism & Sport Interim Review July 2022

Shaw Report

|

July 19, 2022

The Shaw Report - Energy & Natural Resources Interim Review June 2022

Shaw Report

|

June 27, 2022

Shaw & Co launches annual analysis of wholesale & retail trade industry

Shaw Report

|

June 29, 2022

The Shaw Report - Automotive, Transport & Logistics Interim Review May 2022

Shaw Report

|

May 19, 2022

Shaw & Co Launches Annual Analysis of Property and Construction Industry

Shaw Report

|

May 6, 2022

The Shaw Report - TMT Interim Review May 2022

Shaw Report

|

May 5, 2022

The Shaw Report - Manufacturing & Engineering Interim Review April 2022

Shaw Report

|

April 8, 2022

The Shaw Report - Food & Drink Interim Review March 2022

Shaw Report

|

March 25, 2022

The Shaw Report - Professional Services Annual Review 2022

Shaw Report

|

March 17, 2022

The Shaw Report - Leisure, Tourism & Sport December 2021

Shaw Report

|

December 14, 2021

The Shaw Report - Health & Life Sciences December 2021

Shaw Report

|

December 10, 2021

The Shaw Report - Banking, Financial & Insurance Services December 2021

Shaw Report

|

December 8, 2021

The Shaw Report - Energy & Natural Resources November 2021

Shaw Report

|

November 16, 2021

The Shaw Report - Technology, Media & Telecoms October 2021

Shaw Report

|

October 28, 2021

The Shaw Report - Automotive, Transport & Logistics October 2021

Shaw Report

|

October 14, 2021

The Shaw Report - Manufacturing & Engineering October 2021

Shaw Report

|

October 1, 2021

The Shaw Report - Food & Drink September 2021

Shaw Report

|

September 27, 2021